Roo News

The Student News Site of University of Missouri - Kansas City

Roo News

Roo News

Pedro Rodriguez.
Finding a New Home
Gracey Saavedra, Staff Writer • November 17, 2023

  UMKC senior and finance major Pedro Rodiguez knows first-hand how difficult it can be to assimilate into a new university.    As a...

The Epperson House is closed to visitors, but can be seen from the distance around campus.
The Spooky History of the Castle on Campus
Aurora Wilson, Lifestyle and Culture Editor • October 31, 2023

  Located at the corner of Cherry and 52 St., the Epperson House looms over UMKC’s campus, haunting students who dare to walk past it.    Construction...

Dr. Villamandos and Dr. Grieco in front of Sancho Panza in the Twentieth Century
UC Berkeley Art Historian To Speak on Historic Haag Murals
Lauren Zoller, Staff Writer • October 30, 2023

  A University of California Berkeley art historian will present her research on Luis Quintanilla, a world-renowned artist whose murals have...

Tayler and the cast sit as they prepare for more filming.
You Are Now Leaving Godly
Lydia Schneider, Staff Writer • October 20, 2023

  Tayler Gilbert, UMKC senior and professional photographer, is putting the final touches on his new film, “Welcome to Godly.”    Gilbert...

Abigail Weiler holds her business card.
Clayful by Abbie
Gracey Saavedra, Staff Writer • October 18, 2023

 Abigail Weiler, fourth-year political science and French major at UMKC, delivers confidence in the form of handmade polymer clay jewelry.    Her...

Impeachment: What’s the point?

United States Senate
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) today released an official Senate photograph of Senators taking the oath at the start of the Senate impeachment trial today.

One of the first things taught in any U.S. government class is the separation of powers. It is a foundational principle of the American system of government.

However, the last few weeks of President Trump’s impeachment process call into question how real that separation is in practice.

The debate over impeachment all started when information was leaked about Trump’s foreign policy towards Ukraine being seemly built around personal political gain in the upcoming election rather than national interest or the common good. After learning about a secret phone call via the media and internal government investigations, the House of Representatives started an impeachment inquiry into the president’s relationship with Ukraine.

Throughout this inquiry, the House gathered relevant witnesses to obtain more facts about the specifics of that relationship and president’s alleged wrongdoing. The House was able to call several witnesses, but all the high-ranking members of the White House, such as acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, dodged the call to testify.

After weeks of fact-finding, the House passed two articles of impeachment for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress against the president.

Those official articles were then sent over to the Senate, where they would be argued over in a trial. Several members of the House were also sent to the Senate to act as the prosecution in this trial while the president was defended by his personal attorneys.

Despite being called a trial, and in many respects being structured like one, what has gone on the Senate simply is not normal.

Typical trials have a pretty well-defined structure. There is pre-trial business, such as picking the jury (which in this case is the entire Senate), and once that is done, the prosecution and defense give opening statements. Afterwards, witnesses give their testimony and evidence is examined, which makes up the core of the trial. The trial is then ended with closing arguments by both sides followed by a verdict from the jury.

In the Senate, some things are similar. There were opening statements from both sides and closing arguments from both sides as well. What the Senate trial has intentionally lacked is new witness testimony. Without calling witnesses, it is difficult to call what has happened a true, legitimate trial.

This makes it especially frustrating when many important potential witnesses, like former national security advisor John Bolton, are practically publicly displaying the information they have about the president’s dealings with Ukraine. Despite this, those witnesses are simply ignored by the Republican-controlled Senate because of the possible damage their testimony might do the president and his party. This is shameful.

Partisanship is a strong force that everyone feels to some degree, but this trial has shown how the party is more important to a majority of senators than their constitutional duty to act as a serious jury. It is expected that not everyone will agree on policy, but proper oversight and fair process shouldn’t be a position that is seen as partisan.

Looking back at it all, one can wonder what the point of this trial even is.

If anything, it is a clear signal of a problem facing people on the local, state and national levels. There is a culture present in the political system that goes against fair processes and proper oversight, and it’s a culture that has been present in institutions on all levels. It has been seen in state-level politics in the last few years. It has even been present in UMKC in the past as well. This culture has ramifications for everyone in how we navigate our schools, communities and our very lives.

Proper leadership is needed to push back against this destructive trend. Sadly, the lack of that leadership in Congress is apparent and hopefully will change for the better in time.

[email protected]

Leave a Comment
Donate to Roo News

Your donation will support the student journalists of University of Missouri - Kansas City. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
Donate to Roo News

Comments (0)

All Roo News Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *